Welcome to this week’s issue Royalist, The Daily Beast’s newsletter for everything for the royal and royal family. Subscribe here to get your inbox every Sunday.
Charles’ decision under new research on cash bags
Cartoon photo Prince Charles He rubs his hands happily as he looks at the backs of Aston Martin’s wine-filled shopping bags. Windsors it is in the king’s mind today.
The picture comes after an astonishing announcement by a politician representing a rich oil-producing Arab state that he personally handed over a suitcase worth 1 million euros (just over $ 1.05 million) to the heir to the throne.
It was one of three more than the 3 million euros ($ 3.2 million) that Prince Charles personally received from former Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Cassim bin Jaber Al Thani, nicknamed ‘HBJ’, since 2011. 2015, ” London Sunday Times reports.
Described as “truly shocking” by a high-ranking ethics officer, the story will strengthen Charles’ reputation for financial indiscipline in many minds. While it is safe to say that his inheritance is in jeopardy, when it comes to money, this certainly raises urgent and new questions about the heir to the throne.
The end of last year, Charles lost his main aide, Michael Fawcett, who was forced to resign from the Charles Foundation after it was revealed that he was openly honoring Saudi Arabia’s billionaire donor in exchange for donations. Charles denied any information about the operation, but the police investigation into the matter was cautious to the point of invisibility and did not respond. Prince Harry accused his father of involvement in what he described as a “scandal”.
In the last disaster that befell Charles Sunday Times Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani announced that he personally gave Charles wallets in three separate cases between 2011 and 2015.
Each time the HBJ gave the prince 1 million euros in 500-euro banknotes – sometimes called “bin Ladens” because they were used by organized crime groups linked to terrorism. At one time, the money was stuffed into plastic shopping bags from a luxurious Chelsea grocery store and the Fortnum & Mason department store, which is the royal charter of the prince. Another time it was in a suitcase, and the third time in a sack.
Clarence House insisted Time Exclusive bankers It doesn’t matter if the money deposited in the Coutts account comes in cash by accident, and “all the right processes have been followed.”
However, a source described as “one of Charles’ former advisers who managed some of the cash.” Sunday Times “Everyone is very worried about the situation,” he said, adding that “the only thing we could do was count the money and keep a record of what we did. Then call the bank.”
A member of Qatar’s ruling al-Thani family, HBJ is a highly controversial figure with a personal fortune of $ 12 billion, serving as Qatar’s prime minister from 2007 to 2013, during which time he has established close ties with the United Kingdom. saw the country’s largest sovereign wealth fund invest in Harrods and London’s famous skyscraper Shard.
It was believed that Charles used his influence to dissuade Qataris from rebuilding a high-profile site in Chelsea called Chelsea Barracks. The Supreme Court ruled that Charles’ involvement was “unexpected and undesirable.”
This was stated by Sir Alistair Graham, former chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life Sunday Times The remarks were “really shocking”: “I would not distinguish between a politician and a member of the royal family. If the Qatari government wants to donate to its fund, then there are better ways to do it than to deal with large sums of cash. ”
Beatrice’s card was reportedly rejected in Glasto
At the other end of the financial scale, Prince Beatrice’s bank card was rejected three times at a bar at the British music festival Glastonbury. A spy said Daily Star: “He tried to pay by card, but was rejected three times.”
Good news for his father Prince Andrewon the money front, however. Mirror The author told Ingrid Seward True Royal TV, reports “Report” Royal Beat“She will not be fired because she will be more anxious and will start talking, giving TV interviews and writing books. They do not want it again. He will be financially secure, but I would be very surprised if he kept the Royal Lodge.
Andrey smiles
If Prince Andrew was worried about losing the title of Duke of York – after 80 percent of the city’s residents said they wanted to cut ties with him – he didn’t show up on Saturday. The Daily MayI showed him Ride a merry horse around the Windsor Castle property.
This was reported by The Daily BeastYork Center MP Rachael Maskell has proposed a “Civil Liberation Bill” after polls showed that 80 percent of citizens wanted to get rid of their relationship with the disgraced king, who refused to stop using the title. In 1986, as a wedding gift to him.
Maskell said Daily Mail“In February, when we looked at the case against Andrew, my constituents said that 80 percent of people want to sever ties with the current Duke of York. So I met with the Community Secretaries here to see how this can be achieved.
He discovered that “there is not even a mechanism to erase the title of monarch. The only real way to do that is for Andrew to no longer call himself Duke of York.
He added: “Using the title of Duke of York is the role of ambassador, he bears the name of our city all over the world.
“And it’s a city of human rights, the only city of human rights in the UK. We are already in a cultural conflict when we talk about the violence against women and girls and the issues we are really working on in the city, how to make York a very safe place.
Subscribe here To get the latest royal news and rumors with Tom Sykes and Tim Teeman.
Epstein Victim: Andrew’s picture “shook” me scary
Annie Farmer, a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, He says to the sun. The picture of Andrew and Maxwell embracing Virginia Roberts Giuffre shakes him. Speaking before Maxwell’s sentencing on Tuesday, Farmer said in a moving statement: “I remember sitting at a table in Houston Hospital after seeing a photo of Maxwell with Virginia Giuffre and Prince Andrew because I understood how they were behaving. The scheme continued.”
Farmer, who claims that the violence at the hands of Epstein and Maxwell took place at the age of 16, writes: “Without you, I would never have met Epstein.” “You have opened the gates of hell. And then, Ghislaine, like a wolf in sheep’s clothing, you used your femininity to betray us, and you took us all to it. Farmer says the couple did “unthinkable things” to him.
The royal family is reconsidering its colonial heritage
The sign that the royal family is at least trying to overcome the many horrors of Britain’s colonial past comes with the news that Prince Charles wants public recognition of slavery, similar to the annual Holocaust commemoration.
During a visit to Rwanda last week, Charles expressed “personal grief” over Britain’s involvement in the slave trade, which no doubt prompted William and Kate to criticize the legacy of slavery in their recent tour of the criticized Caribbean. like “silent snow” in some circles.
This was reported by a high-ranking source in the kingdom Sunday Times“She is a patron of the Holocaust Remembrance Day Trust and notes that in the UK we now know everything about the Holocaust and learn about it in school, so it is something that is accepted and learned at the national level. This does not apply to the transatlantic slave trade, and perhaps it should.
“So, like Holocaust Remembrance Day, is there a way to do that?” There is a moment, is there a way to remember it? ”
Queen Elizabeth II crowns her son, Prince Charles of Wales, at an investment ceremony at Caernarvon Castle.
Hulton Archive / Getty
This week in royal history
July 1 is one of the strangest dates in the royal calendar, the same day in 1961 as Princess Diana’s birthday, and eight years later in 1969, Prince Charles became Prince of Wales at an investment ceremony at Caernarvon Castle. In north Wales.
Unanswered questions
If someone comes to your house three times with a million dollars in cash, don’t you think you should call the authorities? This begs the question: will the latest mysterious money scandal be simply embarrassing for Prince Charles, or will it worsen and threaten his de facto legitimacy as a monarch?
Do you like The Royal News of The Daily Beast? Sign up here To send Royalist newsletters directly to your inbox.
